Foreign studies is becoming common in many countries with more than a million students educated each year. For developing countries, studying abroad offers many of the promises and fears of brain drain. But understanding the impact is hard, because people self-select into whether or not to study abroad, and there are no lotteries or other experiments we can turn to for easy answers. There are three studies which is conducted by researches, this helps in deciding the exposure to overseas education. Seven Educon is one of the overseas college admission consultant in mumbai
In one of the studies conducted by Matthias Parey and Fabian Waldinger, German students who live abroad in the first 5 years after graduating found studying abroad increases their likelihood of working abroad by fifteen percentages. Another study uses instrumental variables for identification. They rely on the fact that the Erasmus program was rolled out slowly through German universities and departments within universities. Controlling for a student’s subject and university, they argue that the fact that, for example, there were scholarships for political science at University X but not for economics, whereas for University Y there were scholarships for economics but not political science, was due to idiosyncratic reasons such as particular faculty connections. What is very nice about the paper is that they take threats to the exclusions restrictions very seriously, and have more than 2 pages carefully discussing possible threats to identification, checks they can do to rule these threats out, and a whole lot of sensitivity analysis. They also note that while IV allows them to only estimate a local average treatment effect (LATE), this LATE is precisely the parameter of policy interest- the effects of studying abroad for those people who only study abroad due to the Erasmus program. Seven Group India has different verticals which deal with foreign education.
A second methodology is utilized by Oosterbeek and Webbink in a paper simply out in Economica. They consider Dutch understudies who apply to a grant program to contemplate for year abroad of alumni think about. The determination board of trustees positions all understudies, and just those whose rank is over a specific cut-off get a grant. This normally prompts a relapse intermittence approach, which thinks about results for understudies simply above and just underneath this limit. The drawback is that the grant is entirely select, so notwithstanding pooling together numerous long stretches of contestants still just gives 25 understudies just beneath the cutoff and 51 simply above. They find for this gathering concentrating abroad improves the probability of living outside of the Netherlands right off the bat in their vocation by 30 rate focuses.
The third, and least persuading paper, is additionally the one that is likely of most direct enthusiasm to creating nations. The Fulbright program provides scholarships to enable foreign students to come to U.S. graduate schools, but then requires that these students return to their home countries for 2 years after graduation. The authors find Fulbright recipients in sciences and engineering have significantly fewer high-impact publications and overall citations, with this result strongest for people from the poorest countries – i.e. being made to go back to a poor country is a career killer.
We at Seven Group offer has different verticals where one of the verticals is Seven Educon  which deals with overseas education. In Seven Academy we offer HR Training in Mumbai.